# Docuss: un esperimento su come incorporare discussioni nelle pagine web **URL:** \ **Category:** Extras\ **Created:** [13 Giugno 2018, 3:16pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/docuss-an-experiment-on-how-to-embed-discussions-in-web-pages/89790 "2018-06-13T15:16:36Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 23
**Author:** ![rkaplan](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/a3d4f5/32.png) [@rkaplan](https://meta.discourse.org/u/rkaplan)\ **Post date:** [13 Gennaio 2019, 12:35pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/docuss-an-experiment-on-how-to-embed-discussions-in-web-pages/89790/23 "2019-01-13T12:35:26Z")
> [@syl](#): > > I’ve decided to provide “use case 2” under an open source license. I’m still thinking about “use case 1”, which is a more technical offering and more complex to deliver to users (as it contains a code injection proxy). Can I suggest a 3rd use case? I have been pondering how to embed Discourse at the bottom of a blog or web page. As you know, standard Discourse cannot be embedded in an iFrame - apparently you resolved the cross-domain scripting concerns. The official technique to embed with Javascript requires navigating back to the Forum in order to add a comment, and though I understand why that is done I think a simpler solution would be nice. So my question is - could you side by side design be the solution to the “embed Discourse” issue? I would suggest not having discussions on a paragraph level with the orange balloon (which would probably result in very few active discussions) but rather a plugin so a Discourse discussion is linked at the URL level with a web page. So a user would view a URL in his browser and a corresponding DIscourse discussion of that URL would appear. Presumably the admin could choose to restrict which URLs can be discussed a forum by either whitelist or blacklist or could allow discussion of any URL. Thoughts? --- _[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/docuss-an-experiment-on-how-to-embed-discussions-in-web-pages/89790)._