# Docuss: ein Experiment zur Einbettung von Diskussionen in Webseiten

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/docuss-an-experiment-on-how-to-embed-discussions-in-web-pages/89790
**Category:** Extras
**Created:** [13. Juni 2018 um 15:16 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/docuss-an-experiment-on-how-to-embed-discussions-in-web-pages/89790 "2018-06-13T15:16:36Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![tophee](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/tophee/32/73406_2.png) [@tophee](https://meta.discourse.org/u/tophee)
#### Post date: [14. Juni 2018 um 20:30 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/docuss-an-experiment-on-how-to-embed-discussions-in-web-pages/89790/3 "2018-06-14T20:30:05Z")

</div>

This is great! Howdya do that?

Am I misunderstanding the idea if I say: what you are implementing are web annotations, but only for a specific website? If not, I’d say [hypothes.is](https://web.hypothes.is/) already offers that functionality and probably in a better way. Except that hypothes.is is not so great at the discussion part. It’s good for annotations and a couple of follow up replies, but when a fully fledged discussion evolves, discourse would be so much better.

I’d love to see a [better integration between discourse and hypothesis](https://meta.discourse.org/t/special-onebox-for-hypothes-is/70946/3). How well does that fit what you are doing?

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/docuss-an-experiment-on-how-to-embed-discussions-in-web-pages/89790)._