# Does "\<1m" make any sensitive difference to "1m"?

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/does-1m-make-any-sensitive-difference-to-1m/48761>\
**Category:** UX\
**Created:** [17 Agosto 2016, 10:32pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/does-1m-make-any-sensitive-difference-to-1m/48761 "2016-08-17T22:32:48Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![meglio](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/meglio/32/71444_2.png) [@meglio](https://meta.discourse.org/u/meglio)\
**Post date:** [17 Agosto 2016, 10:32pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/does-1m-make-any-sensitive-difference-to-1m/48761/1 "2016-08-17T22:32:48Z")

</div>

Just looking at this list:

 ![](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/3X/1/e/1eb1facfb2b61fe3b43172064374c69102cee7cb.jpg)

Note how the first of the latest topics says `<1m`, then the next says `31m`.

I might be mistaken, but it seems that for aestethics, `<1m` should be changed to `1m`. This change will make little to no difference in meaning, but will remove that special case for timespans less than one minute.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/does-1m-make-any-sensitive-difference-to-1m/48761)._
