# Discourse 能否正常处理 IPv6 的屏蔽？

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/does-discourse-handle-blocking-of-ipv6-okay/83125>\
**Category:** Product Support\
**Created:** [2018 年3 月 16 日 05:38 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/does-discourse-handle-blocking-of-ipv6-okay/83125 "2018-03-16T05:38:29Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

作者： ![supermathie](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/supermathie/32/507518_2.png) [@supermathie](https://meta.discourse.org/u/supermathie)\
发布日期： [2018 年3 月 16 日 14:22 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/does-discourse-handle-blocking-of-ipv6-okay/83125/5 "2018-03-16T14:22:29Z")

</div>

I can confirm that if you add a block for an IPv6 range (e.g. `2001:2012:208:2a00::/64`) it’ll work as expected:

![image](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/3X/5/0/5034983619aa4a53fbc4cb494c79f3f3da0e5ef2.png)

but we do need to fix search and the column width.

As for the automatic roll-up, we probably want to do something like:

- if we have ≥3 blocks in the same IPv6 /64, then summarize to blocking that /64

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/does-discourse-handle-blocking-of-ipv6-okay/83125)._