# Double Likes... as a feature!

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/double-likes-as-a-feature/19028>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Created:** [Août 19, 2014, 3:47 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/double-likes-as-a-feature/19028 "2014-08-19T03:47:20Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![codinghorror](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/codinghorror/32/110067_2.png) [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)\
**Post date:** [Août 19, 2014, 6:02 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/double-likes-as-a-feature/19028/8 "2014-08-19T18:02:08Z")

</div>

That weighting is for topic summary mode, e.g. this:

![](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/3X/2/c/2c73d048fd8b3b6efcc6eff8b07e70fb6d8183f1.png)

You’ll see that on any topic with more than 50 posts, it is the Reader’s Digest Condensed Version aka “Ain’t nobody got time to read all that!” mode.

![](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/2X/f/f701060ae0d9f3f47cc76a6be252136442fec79d.jpg)

It’s still **one like** , it just counts more toward the “is this one of the more interesting posts in the topic” rating if it’s from staff.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/double-likes-as-a-feature/19028)._