# Email/Webhook Notification for Critical Security Updates

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/email-webhook-notification-for-critical-security-updates/294951
**Category:** Support
**Created:** [February 10, 2024, 4:09pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/email-webhook-notification-for-critical-security-updates/294951 "2024-02-10T16:09:12Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![JammyDodger](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/jammydodger/32/254611_2.png) [@JammyDodger](https://meta.discourse.org/u/JammyDodger)
#### Post date: [February 10, 2024, 6:12pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/email-webhook-notification-for-critical-security-updates/294951/4 "2024-02-10T18:12:09Z")

</div>

Now you mention it, that does sound familiar. I think there’s an open #Contribute > UX topic here suggesting making those emails more configurable:

> [@Change sending New Version email to developer email (or configurable group)](https://meta.discourse.org/t/change-sending-new-version-email-to-developer-email-or-configurable-group/286170):
>
> Yes, That’s a pain point. It should rather default to the developer\_emails as defined in app.yml because the dev/sysadmin is far more interested in pushing the update than website support (which could be a non-tech team altogether)

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/email-webhook-notification-for-critical-security-updates/294951)._