# Email with formatting from Protonmail not parsed fully

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/email-with-formatting-from-protonmail-not-parsed-fully/206639>\
**Category:** Bug\
**Created:** [October 21, 2021, 9:35am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/email-with-formatting-from-protonmail-not-parsed-fully/206639 "2021-10-21T09:35:00Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![roke\_julian\_lockhart](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/roke_julian_lockhart/32/540179_2.png) [@roke\_julian\_lockhart](https://meta.discourse.org/u/roke_julian_lockhart)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2025, 8:53pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/email-with-formatting-from-protonmail-not-parsed-fully/206639/4 "2025-09-29T20:53:19Z")

</div>

@meglio, although the absent content is problematic, if that text is contained within `<p>`s, the line break should be expected. If not, a `<br>` would, indeed, be the most accurate replacement. Regardless, large fonts should not become headings. Those are very different semantic definitions, regardless of CSS.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/email-with-formatting-from-protonmail-not-parsed-fully/206639)._