# 包含多个收件人的电子邮件只显示一个收件人

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/emails-with-multiple-recipients-only-showing-up-to-one-recipient/62954>\
**Category:** Product Support\
**Created:** [2017 年5 月 18 日 15:30 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/emails-with-multiple-recipients-only-showing-up-to-one-recipient/62954 "2017-05-18T15:30:28Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

作者： ![fefrei](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/fefrei/32/119538_2.png) [@fefrei](https://meta.discourse.org/u/fefrei)\
发布日期： [2017 年5 月 19 日 18:27 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/emails-with-multiple-recipients-only-showing-up-to-one-recipient/62954/7 "2017-05-19T18:27:47Z")

</div>

> [@mpalmer](#):
>
> Arguably, this is correct behaviour, because Discourse doesn’t have the concept of “a single message which exists in multiple groups/categories”, and while it might be annoying to have your carefully crafted missive only show up in one of the places you expect it to, splitting the conversation on one topic into two places seems like cutting off your nose to spite your face.

Actually, if a message is sent to two groups, I wouldn’t expect two copies to be created, but one message to both groups – which Discourse supports 🙂

This would be consistent to what happens when you type multiple recipients here:

 ![](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/3X/1/5/15f7e53ea4c513f128fab39fc7e698193a6ac824.png)

Is there any reason not to do this?

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/emails-with-multiple-recipients-only-showing-up-to-one-recipient/62954)._