기금 모금 링크에 대한 Meta에서 서명 플러그인 활성화

I don’t think the signature plugin makes it easier.
The signatures are hidden by default. Users have to activate them in their preferences; otherwise, they won’t see them. So it is likely most people would never see the link.

2개의 좋아요

As someone who might stand to benefit from signatures, I hate signatures too and think that the profile popup is good enough. I wouldn’t use a signature if one were available. I suppose a user custom field and a theme component that added a tips link to the profile could help, but I mostly doubt it.

5개의 좋아요

그것은 제품 자체의 기능 요청이 아니라, 메타(meta)에 대한 변경 제안이었습니다. 따라서 해당 주제는 #contribute:feature가 아니라 #contribute:site-feedback에 속하며, 사이트 피드백에는 투표 기능이 없습니다.

아무리 투표 기능이 있다 해도, 제가 말했듯이 메타에서 서명(Signatures)을 활성화하지 않을 것입니다.

3개의 좋아요

I do as well, I rarely view them

Yes, that’s the issue, we all have very narrow world views, and narrow thinking, we can so easily war with one another, where it becomes difficult is to listen and care for one another.

So hidden by default, why?

They are often cluttered with arbitrary opinions that don’t serve a purpose

If they have a sole purpose, and this could be a flagship example, then would you hide them by default?

Where’s the harm in giving it a year, activate a group with permission, allow specific types of members into the group, then have them offer feedback in keeping or modifying?

lol, we must be related, I resist and resist, until I don’t, then realize the harm I only caused myself, examples are huge and many.

I hate you guys make me feel like a union rep trying to advocate for better wages too as I believe in right to work ideals, so…one more item resisted soon to be removed?

Oh I don’t doubt your ability to resist the idea, I doubt your ability to embrace it, I put it forward to help, how does a preferred pronoun help anyhow?

Its for third party discussion, to keep from repeating a name, if we looked at the need for it what would we find? :cricket:

How does changing master/slave or white list/black list help when they’re not even viewed often? Are coders ripe with a supremacy complex, ohh wait.. bad example, are they known or targeted as intolerant to minorities?

Why put so much effort out for no reward, maybe a bit of self gratification on being politically correct for the moment?

Yet serious discussion for true reward won’t be had?

What truly make’s a place civilized?

Seriously, where are the priorities?

People need to be paid, they need to be appreciated, there’s wonderful people here, where will they be when the next software solution comes out and gives people what they need?

Loyal to history or loyal to the future?

1개의 좋아요

I think this is going off-topic.

But the question has been raised, and I’m afraid it’s a hard pass.

Even if the plugin could be limited to groups (which it currently isn’t), having a fund-raising link attached to every post that person makes is not something we want. It’s noisy, and a little spammy.

I’m going to close this topic off now. :+1:

3개의 좋아요