# הרחב הערת שוליים לכלול 'הערות שוליים' **URL:** \ **Category:** Feature\ **Tags:** footnote\ **Created:** [13 ביוני,‏ 2022,‏ 2:04pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/extend-footnote-to-include-annotations/230857 "2022-06-13T14:04:59Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 1
**Author:** ![mlgtechuser](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/mlgtechuser/32/262708_2.png) [@mlgtechuser](https://meta.discourse.org/u/mlgtechuser)\ **Post date:** [13 ביוני,‏ 2022,‏ 2:04pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/extend-footnote-to-include-annotations/230857/1 "2022-06-13T14:04:59Z")
Testing… The editor always shows something different from what gets rendered in the topic thread \[1\] `markdown: [^note] + [^note]: This is supposed to be a footnote.`. [**In a test post**](https://discuss.python.org/t/footnote-markdown-plugin/7845/10?u=mlgtechuser) over at [discourse.python.org](http://discourse.python.org), placing the caret inside OR outside the square brackets both produce an inline note \[2\] `markdown: ^[this is coded as an inline note]`. …and the same thing happens here. It looks great in the editor’s Preview Pane, but doesn’t render as expected in the thread. (Although the hyperlinks are also very dark _and small_ in the Dark Theme currently active at [discourse.python.org](http://discourse.python.org).) I think I’m going to use folding dropdowns \<1\>. > **\<1\>** > > Because I can put them immediately after the paragraph that relates to the extra info–and they might, when collapsed, even take up fewer lines than a long footnote would. (Tried to use square brackets around the ‘1’ but couldn’t figure out how to escape the square brackets to keep them from confusing the markdown interpreter.) * * * 1. This is supposed to be a footnote. 2. This is coded as an inline note --- _[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/extend-footnote-to-include-annotations/230857)._