# Feature request: show TL3 requirements to people that have reached TL3 in the past

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/feature-request-show-tl3-requirements-to-people-that-have-reached-tl3-in-the-past/315329
**Category:** Feature
**Tags:** trust-levels
**Created:** [July 7, 2024, 3:02pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/feature-request-show-tl3-requirements-to-people-that-have-reached-tl3-in-the-past/315329 "2024-07-07T15:02:08Z")
**Posts on this page:** 4
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![piffy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/piffy/32/254198_2.png) [@piffy](https://meta.discourse.org/u/piffy)
#### Post date: [July 7, 2024, 3:02pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/feature-request-show-tl3-requirements-to-people-that-have-reached-tl3-in-the-past/315329/1 "2024-07-07T15:02:08Z")

</div>

What I’m referring to is this page

 ![Screenshot_20240707_105322_Chrome](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/4X/d/b/0/db0f3ba7dbd7cc2b91b049da00bb1423e4be44af.jpeg)

I understand why it might be a undesirable thing to show someone the TL3 requirements - because they can just do the bare minimum inorganically to race to complete the requirements.

But a reoccurring issue I’m having is users who were TL3 suddenly not meeting the requirements after 100 days. And from their perspective, for no reason. I’ve had at least 3 people directly ask me if I removed them from TL3 intentionally (which means many more people who may think the same but never say anything). And usually it’s because of a singular requirement not being met (like above).

So what I would like is some way for the users who dropped TL3 → TL2 to see the exact requirements they no longer meet. They would have already reached TL3 organically in the past so this speedrun gamification isn’t a concern.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![NateDhaliwal](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/natedhaliwal/32/313494_2.png) [@NateDhaliwal](https://meta.discourse.org/u/NateDhaliwal)
#### Post date: [July 7, 2024, 11:24pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/feature-request-show-tl3-requirements-to-people-that-have-reached-tl3-in-the-past/315329/2 "2024-07-07T23:24:46Z")

</div>

Is it possible, perhaps, to drop the requirement that most people don’t meet?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![piffy](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/piffy/32/254198_2.png) [@piffy](https://meta.discourse.org/u/piffy)
#### Post date: [July 8, 2024, 12:02am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/feature-request-show-tl3-requirements-to-people-that-have-reached-tl3-in-the-past/315329/3 "2024-07-08T00:02:44Z")

</div>

Appreciate the response, but from what I have seen there’s not one specific requirement that causes the issue.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![chrisc](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/chrisc/32/119982_2.png) [@chrisc](https://meta.discourse.org/u/chrisc)
#### Post date: [November 15, 2024, 2:49pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/feature-request-show-tl3-requirements-to-people-that-have-reached-tl3-in-the-past/315329/4 "2024-11-15T14:49:34Z")

</div>

This is a good suggestion, I was on the verge of asking on the [Ansible forum](https://forum.ansible.com/t/allow-our-forum-gardeners-to-mark-solutions/2955/9?u=chris) if I had been manually downgraded to Trust Level 2 before I found this thread and realised that it was probably automatic!

Another option could be to make it harder to lose TL3 than it is to gain it — for example so a user has to more-or-less drop out to lose it, rather than simply be less active than previously? 🤷