# Feature suggestion: Content quality levels/curated tab

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/feature-suggestion-content-quality-levels-curated-tab/31584>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Tags:** trust-levels\
**Created:** [2015 年7 月 30 日 23:47 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/feature-suggestion-content-quality-levels-curated-tab/31584 "2015-07-30T23:47:04Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

作者： ![Daniel\_M](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/eb9ed0/32.png) [@Daniel\_M](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Daniel_M)\
发布日期： [2015 年7 月 30 日 23:47 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/feature-suggestion-content-quality-levels-curated-tab/31584/1 "2015-07-30T23:47:04Z")

</div>

This expands on [this post](https://meta.discourse.org/t/defining-trust-levels/3025/14) from two years ago.

So here is what I propose:  
In addition to trust levels, discourse can support Content Quality Levels.

 ![](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/3X/5/c/5c9acac671b6ee26d7213a7d0e9ebaa098908b1b.jpg) 

(Note: I did not make this graph, it was copied from the linked post)

Trust levels are already implemented, on the Y-axis.  
People who consistently post quality content can ascend on the X-axis.

What would this do?  
A new tab can be added (“Featured” or “Curated”) which can be calculated by likes, date (more recent is better; maybe along a curve like y=sqrt(-(x-5)) or something similar), and manual influence by curators.

CQLs can be calculated by maybe (# of likes \* avg. CQL of likers).  
This can be accompanied by a badge (quality contributor, curator, quality curator) and increased flag priority/like limit.

This would be especially powerful when combined with something like [this](https://meta.discourse.org/t/curated-home-plugin/23474).

Additionally, a high CQL can be a factor in automatic promotion to TL4.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/feature-suggestion-content-quality-levels-curated-tab/31584)._