# Feedback on AI Summarisation

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/feedback-on-ai-summarisation/275747
**Category:** UX
**Tags:** ai, ai-summarize
**Created:** [June 15, 2023, 5:39am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/feedback-on-ai-summarisation/275747 "2023-06-15T05:39:58Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Falco](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/falco/32/179432_2.png) [@Falco](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Falco)
#### Post date: [December 1, 2024, 5:57pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/feedback-on-ai-summarisation/275747/8 "2024-12-01T17:57:38Z")

</div>

> [@markschmucker](#):
>
> Using Gemini 1.5 Flash, the summaries often contain links to multiple posts, but the multiple links are not rendered as links

> [@markschmucker](#):
>
> The corresponding response payload includes this text:
> 
> `[Username redacted](/t/-/56915/8, /t/-/56915/13, /t/-/56915/28, /t/-/56915/33, /t/-/56915/36)`

Well, that is simply invalid markdown that is why it doesn’t work.

It is a shame Gemini Flash can’t produce valid markdown, here on Meta we use Llama 3.1 quantized down to FP8 for summaries, and it can handle producing proper markdown links just fine.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/feedback-on-ai-summarisation/275747)._