# Flag option to include TL4 to move posts **URL:** \ **Category:** Feature\ **Created:** [26 Fevereiro , 2015 12:03 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/flag-option-to-include-tl4-to-move-posts/25730 "2015-02-26T12:03:29Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 13
**Author:** ![cpradio](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/cpradio/32/4970_2.png) [@cpradio](https://meta.discourse.org/u/cpradio)\ **Post date:** [27 Fevereiro , 2015 17:35 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/flag-option-to-include-tl4-to-move-posts/25730/13 "2015-02-27T17:35:40Z")
No, I get that. I wouldn’t mind if TL 3 had a list of “posts flagged as spam” and had two buttons, Agree and Disagree. Agree would silently flag it again as spam to hide it. Disagree would clear the flag from the post. The thought being TL 3 are supposed to represent trusted users. These are things you can practically do today as a TL 3 user. When a TL 3 flags something as spam the post gets hidden immediately, so that falls in line with the Agree button. As TL 3, if you see a post that “doesn’t look spammy” to you, regardless if someone else flagged it, your lack of flagging it as well shows you disagreed with the prior person (on a very theoretical level – since you don’t actually know the person flagged it). So that “sort of” falls in line with the Disagree button (maybe Disagree simply removes the post from the TL 3 Spam List, and thus Moderators/Staff must deal with that post?). I really don’t mind giving TL 3 a list to work (should they choose to do so). However. I feel it equally important to let TL 3 decide NOT to work it. They should have a way to exempt themselves from any notifications that list may shoot out. They are not staff, they are not required to perform those duties. --- _[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/flag-option-to-include-tl4-to-move-posts/25730)._