# Flag option to include TL4 to move posts

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/flag-option-to-include-tl4-to-move-posts/25730>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Created:** [26 Fevereiro , 2015 12:03 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/flag-option-to-include-tl4-to-move-posts/25730 "2015-02-26T12:03:29Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Kuro](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/kuro/32/38491_2.png) [@Kuro](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Kuro)\
**Post date:** [27 Fevereiro , 2015 16:25 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/flag-option-to-include-tl4-to-move-posts/25730/7 "2015-02-27T16:25:26Z")

</div>

> [@sam](#):
>
> I would go as far as to say that “spam” list should be exposed to TL3 as well.

As a user who is currently a TL3, how would that work UI wise? Would we get notifications about each and every spam? Would there be a seperate page to go to just to see the spam-list?  
Why would a TL3-user want to flag spam as spam in the first place? Would they also be able to clear spam flags? (So many questions)

> [@boomzilla](#):
>
> This sounds likely to cause confusion, at least for our users.

It’s not like we don’t like some confusion every once in a while, right? 😃

Filed Under: [I still have trouble placing TL3 into the greater picture. I know there are topics about this but I still don’t see what kind of responsibility they are supposed to recieve… maybe I am not in the right forum for that 😛](#tag)

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/flag-option-to-include-tl4-to-move-posts/25730)._