# Forum federation thread on the.socialmusic.network

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/forum-federation-thread-on-the-socialmusic-network/370991
**Category:** General
**Tags:** activitypub
**Created:** [June 20, 2025, 8:13am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/forum-federation-thread-on-the-socialmusic-network/370991 "2025-06-20T08:13:22Z")
**Posts on this page:** 5
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![trwnh](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/trwnh/32/509583_2.png) [@trwnh](https://meta.discourse.org/u/trwnh)
#### Post date: [June 26, 2025, 5:31am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/forum-federation-thread-on-the-socialmusic-network/370991/27 "2025-06-26T05:31:16Z")

</div>

tobiaseigen:

> It does not feel like a support topic but is in the support category on [meta.discourse.org](http://meta.discourse.org)

 tobiaseigen:

> Maybe we move it to the community category, where we talk about community management?

Over here on SocialHub, it’s just a general category for the Discourse software (Software \> Discourse), not specifically for support requests. It seems like whoever set up the federation/linking did not consider this.

I would propose that [meta.discourse.org](http://meta.discourse.org) unlink the `Discourse - SocialHub` category from their “Support” category. It would probably make sense to link it to something more general.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![strypey1](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/strypey1/32/510233_2.png) [@strypey1](https://meta.discourse.org/u/strypey1)
#### Post date: [July 1, 2025, 12:47am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/forum-federation-thread-on-the-socialmusic-network/370991/28 "2025-07-01T00:47:04Z")

</div>

tobiaseigen:

> Maybe we move it to the community category, where we talk about community management?

Topics started on the Discourse category on SH are most likely to be of interest to AP-plugin devs like @angus . If there is a category on Meta for the AP-plugin, I would have our Discourse category synced with that.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Moin](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/moin/32/554653_2.png) [@Moin](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Moin)
#### Post date: [July 1, 2025, 7:54am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/forum-federation-thread-on-the-socialmusic-network/370991/29 "2025-07-01T07:54:02Z")

</div>

There is no ActivityPub category on Meta; there is a tag for that. And it’s the tag that follows the category on your forum. So topics here are created uncategorized but with the #activitypub tag.  
Angus explained that before in April:

> [@Topics made with ActivityPub don't have a category?](https://meta.discourse.org/t/topics-made-with-activitypub-dont-have-a-category/360221/6):
>
> Thanks for the suggestions @NateDhaliwal. To clarify that topic you linked to was originally created on socialhub.activitypub.rocks. You can see where it was originally posted in the ActivityPub info. Perhaps if I go over how this works a little more you might see why that wouldn’t make sense. Discourse supports two type of ActivityPub actors who can publish and receive posts: categories and tags. Currently on meta there are two categories and four tags whi…

A community member moved the post to the support category. I guess I would have chosen the same category because, to me

> [@strypey](#):
>
> trying to get their heads around how to use the AP federation features

sounds like they need help (in contrast to, e.g., reporting a #Contribute > Bug or requesting a #Contribute > Feature).

Though the #General category, where it is now, of course, also works, as general works for everything.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![strypey1](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/strypey1/32/510233_2.png) [@strypey1](https://meta.discourse.org/u/strypey1)
#### Post date: [July 1, 2025, 9:38pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/forum-federation-thread-on-the-socialmusic-network/370991/30 "2025-07-01T21:38:43Z")

</div>

Moin:

> There is no ActivityPub category on Meta; there is a tag for that

Ah, OK. Thanks for the clarification. I didn’t know both categories and tags on Discourse can be federated, that’s a cool feature. So just to be clear, our Discourse category on SH receives a federated copy of anything posted in any category on Meta with thr ActivityPub tag?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![strypey1](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/strypey1/32/510233_2.png) [@strypey1](https://meta.discourse.org/u/strypey1)
#### Post date: [July 5, 2025, 11:49pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/forum-federation-thread-on-the-socialmusic-network/370991/31 "2025-07-05T23:49:33Z")

</div>

Coming back to the original topic, there is another thread on the.socialmusic.network about the interop between @discourse,@nodebb and MBin, which raises a couple of [UX issue to be ironed out in forum federation](https://the.socialmusic.network/t/testing-federation-with-we-distribute/470/12).

One is a variant of the same one we stumbled on in this thread. How to accurately communicate where a topic started, and where subsequent replies come from. Then there's that old bugbear of fediverse threads, missing steps in the staircase of the conversation;

> "I can see this post from completely different software (Mbin), so that's cool, but I don't see replies from 'social music network', and for some reason it thinks that fedimusic community is on forum.wedistribute"

[Previous page](https://meta.discourse.org/t/forum-federation-thread-on-the-socialmusic-network/370991.md?page=1)
