Giant Images from originally tiny images

(Matches) #1

(Jeff Atwood) #2

I believe this might be because @awesomerobot set expanded images (those that exist in expanded replies or expanded in-reply-to) to 100% width? Maybe they should be max-width instead @awesomerobot?

(Kris) #3

yes, that shouldn’t be there anymore either way! fixing now.

also - why is that quote image squished in this topic? looks like it’s originally 690x236, but the dimensions in the image tag are disproportionately squishing it to 690x153

(Matches) #4

Probably somebody taking a screenshot then squishing it. We do a lot of weird things, it’s usually better not to ask unless we complain its squished.

(Jeff Atwood) #5