# Godaddy has much lower server requirements than DigitalOcean **URL:** \ **Category:** Self-hosting\ **Tags:** hosting\ **Created:** [Abril 16, 2016, 3:55am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/godaddy-has-much-lower-server-requirements-than-digitalocean/42648 "2016-04-16T03:55:27Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 2
**Author:** ![purldator](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/p/bcef8e/32.png) [@purldator](https://meta.discourse.org/u/purldator)\ **Post date:** [Abril 16, 2016, 4:41am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/godaddy-has-much-lower-server-requirements-than-digitalocean/42648/2 "2016-04-16T04:41:38Z")
They will not restrict you from purchasing cloud app storage based on what you may decide to use the cloud storage _for_. Some of those apps listed work fine on a 512MB/1CPU virtual box. They care not what apps you decide to use on that low-end virtual box. They do not care if you buy the low end package and attempt to deploy Discourse onto it and use it for a medium to large community. Well, depends if they charge for overloading the CPU, but neither here or there in this discussion. Same as DigitalOcean, really. --- _[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/godaddy-has-much-lower-server-requirements-than-digitalocean/42648)._