# Godaddy has much lower server requirements than DigitalOcean

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/godaddy-has-much-lower-server-requirements-than-digitalocean/42648>\
**Category:** Self-hosting\
**Tags:** hosting\
**Created:** [4월 16, 2016, 3:55오전 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/godaddy-has-much-lower-server-requirements-than-digitalocean/42648 "2016-04-16T03:55:27Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ColdSun](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/coldsun/32/66668_2.png) [@ColdSun](https://meta.discourse.org/u/ColdSun)\
**Post date:** [4월 16, 2016, 4:53오전 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/godaddy-has-much-lower-server-requirements-than-digitalocean/42648/8 "2016-04-16T04:53:21Z")

</div>

I’ve ran it on a 2.8Ghz 512MB sandbox. No, it wasn’t hosted by GoDaddy.  
The specs work ‘okay’ for a development box. They are not suitable for a live community, the developers here have stated as such.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/godaddy-has-much-lower-server-requirements-than-digitalocean/42648)._