Try putting this into Google: site:forum.hearingtracker.com/t/costco-kirkland-signature-9-0-product-information/45380 Here’s the results you will see (48 results for a single page): [image] This is a duplicate content bug, and should be considered an urgent SEO issue for the Discourse platform …

[图片] abrambailey: So, I guess the rationale here is that long threads are paginated, but since this is a lazy-loading SPA, the canonicals are behaving as if traditional pagination is happening. I’m honestly not sure what the rationale is for doing it this way. This is wrong. For crawlers, Di…

[图片] Falco: For crawlers, Discourse uses 20 posts longs pages, so every single post can be crawled just fine. There is no SPA for bots. Sorry, SPA may be the wrong term, I just meant that a Discourse thread kind of behaves like a single page app in the sense that pagination is happening dynam…

How would that be better for the forum’s human visitors? Do you not think some might become confused if they think they’re going to eg. “page 2” and land on an area of “the only page”? Might they look in vain for pagination navigation that isn’t there?

I’d rather have more confused visitors than less traffic from Google. Duplicate content is a real SEO problem, and the “loves” on your comment by two Discourse team members is seriously perplexing.

[图片] abrambailey: Duplicate content is a real SEO problem I am not sure I’d think it serious enough to call it “a real SEO problem”. AFAIK, what happens without rel="canonical" is the search engines decide which result URL best matches the search instead of what a site might prefer to be the …

I think you may have skipped over the image I posted above… Here’s the text: John Mueller commented , “We don’t treat pagination differently. We treat them as normal pages.” Meaning paginated pages are not recognized by Google as a series of pages consolidated into one piece of content as they pre…

[图片] abrambailey: skipped over the image Ah, thanks, I did miss that the concern isn’t about duplicate content but rather duplicate title and meta description warnings. For Discourse at least, those are more like “notices” than warnings. Kind of like “if you didn’t know about this you should…

Google 多次索引同一页面：规范标签问题

支持

abrambailey (Abram Bailey) 2019 年10 月 18 日 18:01 5

我宁愿有更多感到困惑的访客，也不愿从 Google 获得较少的流量。重复内容确实是 SEO 的一大难题，而你评论下两位 Discourse 团队成员点下的“赞”更是令人费解。

话题		回复	浏览量
Adding Canonical Redirects for SEO Optimization Support	23	7665	2015 年10 月 1 日
?page= sometimes redirects to a page with a different canonical URL Bug	2	788	2020 年10 月 19 日
Removing the /2, /3, /4, etc links for each reply within a topic URL Development seo	33	4650	2024 年10 月 13 日
Negative SEO because of too much category pages getting indexed Support	8	1824	2017 年7 月 3 日
Canonical tag not reset after client-side redirect from crawler ?page=N to /t/slug/id/<post_number> Bug seo	0	58	2026 年9 月 14 日

Google 多次索引同一页面：规范标签问题

相关话题