# Google seo ideas **URL:** \ **Category:** Community Building\ **Created:** [August 13, 2017, 5:24am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/google-seo-ideas/67951 "2017-08-13T05:24:39Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 8
**Author:** ![maiki](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/maiki/32/233950_2.png) [@maiki](https://meta.discourse.org/u/maiki)\ **Post date:** [August 14, 2017, 11:08am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/google-seo-ideas/67951/8 "2017-08-14T11:08:15Z")
> [@Ham](#): > > However there are some topics and titles that would sound “fake” or unnatural but do well for blog when considering seo. > > Instead of these popping up in latest, I’m talking about in its own category that would not be included in latest but it would allow crawlers to search and index thus sending more traffic to the site. Something were staff and veteran members would know this category is meant for those type of seo tactics. These “tactics” are exactly what search engines punish. Search engines make money on ads, and they serve ads to customers that use them because they give accurate results. If you are trying to write something because it lists higher up, but doesn’t have substance, eventually search engines will figure it out and your site will be treated appropriately. But more than that, it makes the web worse. **Please don’t make the web worse.** Every time you try an “SEO tactic”, a kitten goes prematurely bald. > [@Ham](#): > > But as they say in marketing every idea isnt a new idea, its just a new idea to that person. [Citation](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citing_sources), please. I searched for that quote and can’t find it. Apparently the people that said it didn’t publish it in a way that search engines like… --- _[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/google-seo-ideas/67951)._