# Google Webmaster Tools does not like topics description
**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/google-webmaster-tools-does-not-like-topics-description/15278
**Category:** Feature
**Created:** [May 3, 2014, 1:25pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/google-webmaster-tools-does-not-like-topics-description/15278 "2014-05-03T13:25:42Z")
**Posts on this page:** 9
**Page:** 1
### Author:  [@CamilleRoux](https://meta.discourse.org/u/CamilleRoux)
#### Post date: [May 3, 2014, 1:25pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/google-webmaster-tools-does-not-like-topics-description/15278/1 "2014-05-03T13:25:42Z")
All the topics have the same meta description and GWT doesn’t like it:
What about using an excerpt of the topic content instead?
---
### Author:  [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)
#### Post date: [May 3, 2014, 4:59pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/google-webmaster-tools-does-not-like-topics-description/15278/2 "2014-05-03T16:59:09Z")
I agree with this, @neil can you make it so meta description on topic pages uses the excerpt function (same one we use for pinned topics) for the meta description?
I know we did this for category pages with the category description courtesy of @djensen47’s suggestion and it worked great.
---
### Author:  [@neil](https://meta.discourse.org/u/neil)
#### Post date: [May 5, 2014, 3:45pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/google-webmaster-tools-does-not-like-topics-description/15278/3 "2014-05-05T15:45:28Z")
We already do that. [Have a look](https://meta.discourse.org/t/google-webmaster-tools-does-not-like-topics-description/15278.rss). What is GWT complaining about?
---
### Author:  [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)
#### Post date: [May 5, 2014, 11:29pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/google-webmaster-tools-does-not-like-topics-description/15278/4 "2014-05-05T23:29:02Z")
I don’t think we do.. I visited this topic with JavaScript disabled and I see
```plaintext
Google Webmaster Tools does not like topics description - Discourse Meta
```
I don’t think having the same **description** here on every Topic page is a good idea?
---
### Author:  [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)
#### Post date: [May 5, 2014, 11:30pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/google-webmaster-tools-does-not-like-topics-description/15278/5 "2014-05-05T23:30:17Z")
Hmm we might have a regression on the category page as well, when I visit `/category/bug` I see
```plaintext
bug Topics - Discourse Meta
```
I’m 99.99% sure the Description field here should be the category description..
---
### Author:  [@neil](https://meta.discourse.org/u/neil)
#### Post date: [May 6, 2014, 11:32pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/google-webmaster-tools-does-not-like-topics-description/15278/6 "2014-05-06T23:32:36Z")
Oh I’m dumb, I had RSS on the brain. I was looking at RSS for some reason…
---
### Author:  [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)
#### Post date: [May 6, 2014, 11:47pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/google-webmaster-tools-does-not-like-topics-description/15278/7 "2014-05-06T23:47:14Z")
Yeah let’s make sure these descriptions are actually excerpts on topics. And particularly on the categories, the description should be the standard category description.
---
### Author:  [@neil](https://meta.discourse.org/u/neil)
#### Post date: [May 7, 2014, 3:47pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/google-webmaster-tools-does-not-like-topics-description/15278/8 "2014-05-07T15:47:29Z")
> [@codinghorror](#):
>
> Yeah let’s make sure these descriptions are actually excerpts on topics. And particularly on the categories, the description should be the standard category description.
Done and done. Enjoy, crawlers.
---
### Author:  [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)
#### Post date: [May 10, 2014, 7:19pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/google-webmaster-tools-does-not-like-topics-description/15278/9 "2014-05-10T19:19:55Z")
This topic was automatically closed after 3 days. New replies are no longer allowed.