# ページ番号によるGooglebotの404エラー

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/googlebot-404-errors-due-to-page-numbers/96337>\
**Category:** Support\
**Created:** [2018 年 9 月 4 日午後 3:46 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/googlebot-404-errors-due-to-page-numbers/96337 "2018-09-04T15:46:41Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 10

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![stas00](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/fbc32d/32.png) [@stas00](https://meta.discourse.org/u/stas00)\
**Post date:** [2019 年 2 月 10 日午後 9:45 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/googlebot-404-errors-due-to-page-numbers/96337/10 "2019-02-10T21:45:39Z")

</div>

> [@sam](#):
>
> That topic was split so you destabilized the page number, it is a fundamental limitation with our numbering implementation

This very [topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/googlebot-404-errors-due-to-page-numbers/96337/) wasn’t split and has [the same problem](https://meta.discourse.org/t/googlebot-404-errors-due-to-page-numbers/96337?page=2). Therefore the way how the shrinking came about matters not.

> Take a book analogy, in a book if you rip out page 77, page 200 remains page 200. In Discourse page 200 becomes page 199

but discourse is not a book which is cast in “paper” once printed, it’s dynamic “living” system. As such I am unable to see where the book metaphor fits in this case.

And even if I run with your metaphor, page 200 remains page 200, so if there was a link to page 200 before that worked - it should work still if pages 1-199 were ripped out. Except, this surely is not the way to fix this problem, which is much simpler if you don’t look at it as a book.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/googlebot-404-errors-due-to-page-numbers/96337)._