# Group administration functions should be better surfaced

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/group-administration-functions-should-be-better-surfaced/112303>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Created:** [March 22, 2019, 6:17am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/group-administration-functions-should-be-better-surfaced/112303 "2019-03-22T06:17:11Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![HAWK](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/hawk/32/86627_2.png) [@HAWK](https://meta.discourse.org/u/HAWK)\
**Post date:** [May 20, 2019, 3:07am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/group-administration-functions-should-be-better-surfaced/112303/7 "2019-05-20T03:07:46Z")

</div>

Adding some weight here as it is something that has come up a few times with potential customers lately. They would like to create ‘curated feeds’ based on group membership so that by default, a member of the ‘Healthcare’ group will have categories that don’t relate to healthcare muted by default (with the ability to override that if they want to).

At the moment this level of curation has to be done by an individual, which many see as too difficult.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/group-administration-functions-should-be-better-surfaced/112303)._