# Group groups for groups page?

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/group-groups-for-groups-page/58232>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Created:** [March 2, 2017, 2:51pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/group-groups-for-groups-page/58232 "2017-03-02T14:51:40Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 11

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tophee](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/tophee/32/73406_2.png) [@tophee](https://meta.discourse.org/u/tophee)\
**Post date:** [December 8, 2017, 9:23pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/group-groups-for-groups-page/58232/11 "2017-12-08T21:23:36Z")

</div>

A search box is surely nice, but it solves a different problem: it makes it easy to find a group if you know what you are looking for.

The idea with groups of groups was to make the groups page more accessible by dividing it into sections, just like on the Badges page. @tobiaseigen provides a nice example above:

> [@tobiaseigen](#):
>
> Right now we are able to (mostly) achieve that on our site by using a particular naming convention for groups…

Look at their groups page and you’ll see:

[https://community.namati.org/groups](https://community.namati.org/groups)

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/group-groups-for-groups-page/58232)._