# 可编辑用户组

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/group-of-users-that-can-edit/129030
**Category:** Support
**Created:** [2019 年9 月 19 日 18:08 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/group-of-users-that-can-edit/129030 "2019-09-19T18:08:15Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 6

<div class="post-metadata">

### 作者： ![JammyDodger](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/jammydodger/32/254611_2.png) [@JammyDodger](https://meta.discourse.org/u/JammyDodger)
#### 发布日期： [2023 年5 月 5 日 15:57 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/group-of-users-that-can-edit/129030/6 "2023-05-05T15:57:40Z")

</div>

这个有一个小的更新——有一些关于群组启用设置的讨论，这可能会涵盖此用例：

> [@Separate 'trusted users can edit others' setting for trust levels 3 & 4](https://meta.discourse.org/t/separate-trusted-users-can-edit-others-setting-for-trust-levels-3-4/257312/2?u=jammydodger):
>
> I am generally warm to adding this fidelity though I would prefer to just “de-trust level” these settings if we do a split and change them so they are group based. edit\_all\_topic\_groups (default: trust\_level\_3) edit\_all\_post\_groups (default: trust\_level\_4) This also automatically add a bunch of extra flexibility and I feel the name of the settings are fairly clear. @mcwumbly thoughts. Not sure when we can slot this, it may be a candidate for #pr-welcome.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/group-of-users-that-can-edit/129030)._