# Group Review Queue Items

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/group-review-queue-items/400783
**Category:** UX
**Tags:** review-queue
**Created:** [April 16, 2026, 10:43am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/group-review-queue-items/400783 "2026-04-16T10:43:12Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![noahl](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/noahl/32/552343_2.png) [@noahl](https://meta.discourse.org/u/noahl)
#### Post date: [April 16, 2026, 10:43am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/group-review-queue-items/400783/1 "2026-04-16T10:43:12Z")

</div>

Hey! Let me tell a story _(that happened about 5 mins ago 😅)_ - which better UX within the review queue would likely have helped avoid.

We had 12 items in the queue, and as usual I work through them in the order they are shown to me.

First in the list is a new user account that was flagged as a likely spam account - I checked their description and other details, and it felt “spammy”, so I deleted the profile.

5-6 items later, I find a first topic from this user 🙃 - and they’re a legit user, with a very real question 🫠

I can’t help but think that had the review queue grouped these items together, I would have made a very different decision about their profile.

Is it possible to add some indication in the queue for cases like this? Or a confirmation dialogue for the more “aggressive” actions. It’s not the first time I’ve accidentally deleted a user, or deleted and blocked them unintentionally.

Something like:

> This user has created X topics, Y posts, and engaged with Z conversations in the last ABC days.
> 
> Continue to delete?

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/group-review-queue-items/400783)._