# Group-specific Whispers in addition to staff

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/group-specific-whispers-in-addition-to-staff/233114>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Tags:** whispers\
**Created:** [July 17, 2022, 4:50pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/group-specific-whispers-in-addition-to-staff/233114 "2022-07-17T16:50:34Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 19

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![merefield](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/merefield/32/176214_2.png) [@merefield](https://meta.discourse.org/u/merefield)\
**Post date:** [August 18, 2024, 6:44am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/group-specific-whispers-in-addition-to-staff/233114/19 "2024-08-18T06:44:56Z")

</div>

> [@Heliosurge](#):
>
> It wouldn’t be secure. And crafty users could circumvent it.

Hmmm … how so?

As long as this is implemented in the back end, the Posts streamed to the client would depend on the users specific authorization.

“Non-admin whispers” would not be included in the serialized information to those not privy to them.

If there are any impediments to implementing this, I don’t think that’s one of them.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/group-specific-whispers-in-addition-to-staff/233114)._