# Having fewer trust levels?

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/having-fewer-trust-levels/317802>\
**Category:** Support\
**Tags:** trust-levels\
**Created:** [July 23, 2024, 10:57am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/having-fewer-trust-levels/317802 "2024-07-23T10:57:05Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![JammyDodger](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/jammydodger/32/254611_2.png) [@JammyDodger](https://meta.discourse.org/u/JammyDodger)\
**Post date:** [July 23, 2024, 11:28am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/having-fewer-trust-levels/317802/3 "2024-07-23T11:28:21Z")

</div>

Hello and welcome @IanManning 🙂

If you’re community is closed to public registrations (and therefore safe from spam signups) then you can change the `default trust level` to TL1 and forgo the spam protection element that TL0 provides. You can also change `tl3 requires days visited` to ‘101’ to make it impossible to achieve, which would then leave you with TL1 and TL2 as the only automatic trust levels remaining.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/having-fewer-trust-levels/317802)._
