# Headless qunit integration tests?
**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/headless-qunit-integration-tests/45513
**Category:** Development
**Created:** [June 10, 2016, 1:48am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/headless-qunit-integration-tests/45513 "2016-06-10T01:48:50Z")
**Posts on this page:** 9
**Page:** 1
### Author:  [@rimian](https://meta.discourse.org/u/rimian)
#### Post date: [June 10, 2016, 1:48am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/headless-qunit-integration-tests/45513/1 "2016-06-10T01:48:50Z")
I’d like to run my integration tests via the command line with support for running a subset of the entire test suite. I’m thinking about setting up gulp and phantomjs to run the tests. Something like: [https://www.npmjs.com/package/node-qunit-phantomjs](https://www.npmjs.com/package/node-qunit-phantomjs)
Has anyone set something like this up? Any pointers?
---
### Author:  [@sam](https://meta.discourse.org/u/sam)
#### Post date: [June 10, 2016, 6:12am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/headless-qunit-integration-tests/45513/2 "2016-06-10T06:12:34Z")
We already have a rake task for this…
```plaintext
rake qunit:test
```
---
### Author:  [@rimian](https://meta.discourse.org/u/rimian)
#### Post date: [June 13, 2016, 11:22pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/headless-qunit-integration-tests/45513/3 "2016-06-13T23:22:50Z")
Oh, of course! Thanks for that.
I’m trying to work out how to run single tests so I can be TDD.
---
### Author:  [@sam](https://meta.discourse.org/u/sam)
#### Post date: [June 13, 2016, 11:38pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/headless-qunit-integration-tests/45513/4 "2016-06-13T23:38:57Z")
In general we use the web browser to run single tests using `/qunit` path
It is doable using the CLI just not implemented yet.
---
### Author:  [@rimian](https://meta.discourse.org/u/rimian)
#### Post date: [June 14, 2016, 2:15am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/headless-qunit-integration-tests/45513/5 "2016-06-14T02:15:30Z")
Here’s a PR that implements that:
[https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/4268](https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/4268)
🙂
---
### Author:  [@sam](https://meta.discourse.org/u/sam)
#### Post date: [June 14, 2016, 2:50am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/headless-qunit-integration-tests/45513/6 "2016-06-14T02:50:44Z")
Merged it in 🙂 good idea,
My dream is somehow to integrate this stuff into `rake autospec` that would be mighty cool.
---
### Author:  [@rimian](https://meta.discourse.org/u/rimian)
#### Post date: [June 14, 2016, 4:22am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/headless-qunit-integration-tests/45513/7 "2016-06-14T04:22:08Z")
Anything that makes testing easier!
It wants to run the tests multiple times which doesn’t make a lot of sense if you’re running a subset via rake on the command line. I included a RETRY flag. I would say the default value should be false but I guess that will break other things.
[https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/4269](https://github.com/discourse/discourse/pull/4269)
---
### Author:  [@eviltrout](https://meta.discourse.org/u/eviltrout)
#### Post date: [June 14, 2016, 2:50pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/headless-qunit-integration-tests/45513/8 "2016-06-14T14:50:12Z")
> [@sam](#):
>
> that would be mighty cool.
I believe @zogstrip took a stab at this and it had many issues. In particular it seemed significantly slower than before.
---
### Author:  [@zogstrip](https://meta.discourse.org/u/zogstrip)
#### Post date: [June 14, 2016, 2:52pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/headless-qunit-integration-tests/45513/9 "2016-06-14T14:52:12Z")
I believe that’s what @sam is suggesting. Having it integrated **nicely** would be mighty cool 😉