# Help us to test the HTML pasting

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/help-us-to-test-the-html-pasting/77661
**Category:** Feature
**Tags:** feedback
**Created:** [December 22, 2017, 7:45am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/help-us-to-test-the-html-pasting/77661 "2017-12-22T07:45:38Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 14

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![schungx](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/schungx/32/70989_2.png) [@schungx](https://meta.discourse.org/u/schungx)
#### Post date: [December 24, 2017, 5:36am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/help-us-to-test-the-html-pasting/77661/14 "2017-12-24T05:36:08Z")

</div>

This is not an improvement wrt Microsoft Word, which uses classes for things like lists instead of tags like `<ul>` and `<ol>`. Why? must ask Microsoft…

It would definitely be a big plus to get Word working… Word and Docs are the two most popular word processors in the world…

EDIT: Check out [HTML EDITOR.in: Free Online WYSIWYG HTML and HTML5 Editor](http://htmleditor.in/index.html) which seems to have it working. It converted from complex Word documents quite fine!

Ironically, this version: [HTML EDITOR.in: Free Online WYSIWYG HTML Editor](http://htmleditor.in/firefox-html-editor.html) which uses TinyMCE chokes on the bulleted lists, indicating custom logic in the original converter.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/help-us-to-test-the-html-pasting/77661)._