# Highlighting the reply as linked topic functionality

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/highlighting-the-reply-as-linked-topic-functionality/276569
**Category:** UX
**Created:** [August 25, 2023, 2:03am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/highlighting-the-reply-as-linked-topic-functionality/276569 "2023-08-25T02:03:07Z")
**Posts on this page:** 4
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![westes](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/westes/32/535721_2.png) [@westes](https://meta.discourse.org/u/westes)
#### Post date: [December 17, 2025, 7:49pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/highlighting-the-reply-as-linked-topic-functionality/276569/22 "2025-12-17T19:49:47Z")

</div>

Just wanted to add to this discussion: I spent 20 minutes looking for “Reply as a linked topic” and never found it. It was only because of this thread that I located it.

If you want a feature to be used, you make it visible to your users. Having a non-default option to reply as a linked topic should be part of the Reply UI, visible to all on every reply.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![ToddZ](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/toddz/32/328350_2.png) [@ToddZ](https://meta.discourse.org/u/ToddZ)
#### Post date: [December 17, 2025, 8:45pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/highlighting-the-reply-as-linked-topic-functionality/276569/23 "2025-12-17T20:45:48Z")

</div>

Oof, I do see a lot of those “No!” decisions in many support forums… 😓

To some degree, it may always come down to more experienced folks and staff tidying things up.

I wonder if the “reply as linked topic” option could be made more obvious, as in Linca’s suggestion above, but only at a designated trust level. It might just confuse the average drive-by help-seeker – but if it appeared for, say, TL2 users, they might see the utility and know when to use it.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![ToddZ](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/toddz/32/328350_2.png) [@ToddZ](https://meta.discourse.org/u/ToddZ)
#### Post date: [December 17, 2025, 8:53pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/highlighting-the-reply-as-linked-topic-functionality/276569/24 "2025-12-17T20:53:05Z")

</div>

I’m physically recoiling at _all_ those AI-generated titles. They’re so… AI. I’d assume the content behind any of those headlines would be slop as well. Please, powers that be, reserve titling as an expression of humanity.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![simon](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/simon/32/339122_2.png) [@simon](https://meta.discourse.org/u/simon)
#### Post date: [December 17, 2025, 10:04pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/highlighting-the-reply-as-linked-topic-functionality/276569/25 "2025-12-17T22:04:27Z")

</div>

> [@ToddZ](#):
>
> I’m physically recoiling at _all_ those AI-generated titles.

Another example of how linked topics could be used to allow for the natural flow of conversation.

I totally agree about the AI generated titles. What seemed acceptable to me in 2023 now triggers a visceral reaction. I think that’s a fairly common reaction to LLM generated text.

[Previous page](https://meta.discourse.org/t/highlighting-the-reply-as-linked-topic-functionality/276569.md?page=1)
