# Hoe geautomatiseerde rapporten kunnen helpen Meta opgeruimd te houden

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/how-automated-reports-could-help-keeping-meta-tidy/367952
**Category:** Site feedback
**Created:** [28 mei 2025 om 15:50 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/how-automated-reports-could-help-keeping-meta-tidy/367952 "2025-05-28T15:50:09Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Moin](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/moin/32/554653_2.png) [@Moin](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Moin)
#### Post date: [28 mei 2025 om 15:50 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/how-automated-reports-could-help-keeping-meta-tidy/367952/1 "2025-05-28T15:50:09Z")

</div>

Yesterday, I thought about whether a [data explorer](https://meta.discourse.org/t/32566?silent=true) query that finds topics tagged #fixed but where the user did not receive the bug reporter badge, combined with an automation that sends that report to a group, would help catch these cases and ensure the users get the badge they deserve. However this will only catch those where the tag was added 🤔 But I don’t think it makes sense to use all the closed bug topics as a basis, because that would also include the duplicate and non-reproducible ones. That’s why I am not sure if it will really help because someone would still have to check that the topics get closed and tagged. I have chosen a more general title; maybe others have some ideas where reports could help. I think Jammy had some that [replaced the automatic bumping of topics](https://meta.discourse.org/t/why-are-old-topics-closed/317656/19).

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/how-automated-reports-could-help-keeping-meta-tidy/367952)._