# Idea: Chat Posts

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/idea-chat-posts/374905>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Created:** [July 19, 2025, 4:34pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/idea-chat-posts/374905 "2025-07-19T16:34:47Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 19

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![satonotdead](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/satonotdead/32/447830_2.png) [@satonotdead](https://meta.discourse.org/u/satonotdead)\
**Post date:** [July 21, 2025, 10:54pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/idea-chat-posts/374905/19 "2025-07-21T22:54:58Z")

</div>

> [@merefield](#):
>
> I think yours is a very pessimistic take.

I insist to continue via PM and it’s better to take a neutral approach without any personal takes.

I understand my point of view as real, not pessimistic, not possitive. Just as is on reality, without sentiments involved.

> [@merefield](#):
>
> Why are you bothering with Discourse then?

Because Discourse is not OpenAI, Gemini or SEO.

> [@merefield](#):
>
> But AI cannot survive without novel content.

They already have all the data they need. Why to continue looking for human interactions when they got ~20 years and everyone is paying for instant replies?

[Google strikes $60 million deal with Reddit, allowing search giant to train AI models on human posts - CBS News](https://www.cbsnews.com/news/google-reddit-60-million-deal-ai-training/)

_All the links shows you a different information that you would take in consideration if you have really interest on it._

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/idea-chat-posts/374905)._