# Improving /admin/plugins

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/improving-admin-plugins/84585>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Created:** [April 4, 2018, 4:23pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/improving-admin-plugins/84585 "2018-04-04T16:23:27Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 9

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Stephen](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/stephen/32/95011_2.png) [@Stephen](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Stephen)\
**Post date:** [April 6, 2018, 4:29am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/improving-admin-plugins/84585/9 "2018-04-06T04:29:09Z")

</div>

> [@tgxworld](#):
>
> I added a check beside official plugins in

Looks good, but will we get any visual differentiation between official and core?

My point originally is that when troubleshooting one of the first steps is usually to look at plugins, so having something which denotes core from official from third party would be _incredibly_ helpful. Particularly in the case I gave above where an official plugin made its way into core, but was still referenced in the app.yml of one of the sites I was investigating.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/improving-admin-plugins/84585)._