# Improving the Groups page for 1.7

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/improving-the-groups-page-for-1-7/53347
**Category:** Feature
**Tags:** feedback
**Created:** [November 24, 2016, 5:12pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/improving-the-groups-page-for-1-7/53347 "2016-11-24T17:12:45Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 70

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![scombs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/scombs/32/48616_2.png) [@scombs](https://meta.discourse.org/u/scombs)
#### Post date: [January 10, 2017, 11:53pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/improving-the-groups-page-for-1-7/53347/70 "2017-01-10T23:53:31Z")

</div>

Not sure we need any cap since only owners are specified in the to: line. I guess last 5 active owners adds a sanity limit, but do people generally have more than 5 owners. Also, perhaps all owners should get the PM.

The larger issue IMO in the @mention in the body of the owner notification email. A workaround is [here](https://meta.discourse.org/t/request-to-join-group-feature-and-requirement-for-message-mention-rights-by-everyone/55264/3).

This @mention issue and who gets notified isn’t really related to this group feature, but the specific PM generated could use a fix.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/improving-the-groups-page-for-1-7/53347)._