# Inaccuracies with post count stats on User page

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/inaccuracies-with-post-count-stats-on-user-page/49464
**Category:** Bug
**Created:** [8월 30, 2016, 11:09오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/inaccuracies-with-post-count-stats-on-user-page/49464 "2016-08-30T23:09:29Z")
**Posts on this page:** 4
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![HAWK](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/hawk/32/86627_2.png) [@HAWK](https://meta.discourse.org/u/HAWK)
#### Post date: [8월 30, 2016, 11:09오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/inaccuracies-with-post-count-stats-on-user-page/49464/1 "2016-08-30T23:09:29Z")

</div>

/users?order=post\_count&period=monthly implies that it displays all users that made a post in the last month, ordered by post count.

If I scroll down to the end of the list there are users with replies logged for the period, that didn’t actually make any.

Here is an example: (1 reply recorded in the period of Jul 31 - Aug 31, last post actually back in March).

 ![](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/3X/1/7/17cd3fe2f407717378b9f2b36fa4f0c8c33ffab2.png)

This user has never responded to a PM and has no flags.

Am I misunderstanding the report, or is the data unreliable?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![codinghorror](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/codinghorror/32/110067_2.png) [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)
#### Post date: [8월 30, 2016, 11:23오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/inaccuracies-with-post-count-stats-on-user-page/49464/2 "2016-08-30T23:23:34Z")

</div>

Possibly a bug, particularly if the only post is out of date range. Let us know if you suss out any other patterns here.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![pfaffman](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/pfaffman/32/120154_2.png) [@pfaffman](https://meta.discourse.org/u/pfaffman)
#### Post date: [8월 31, 2016, 1:13오전 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/inaccuracies-with-post-count-stats-on-user-page/49464/3 "2016-08-31T01:13:14Z")

</div>

I noticed some similar queetionable stats a week or so ago. Maybe they don’t get rebuilt right after an upgrade? Or sometimes it fails for some reason and old stats stay around?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Mittineague](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/mittineague/32/114259_2.png) [@Mittineague](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Mittineague)
#### Post date: [8월 31, 2016, 2:02오전 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/inaccuracies-with-post-count-stats-on-user-page/49464/4 "2016-08-31T02:02:09Z")

</div>

> [@pfaffman](#):
>
> old stats stay around?

I know newly joined members don’t make it into the User page for a while. AFAIK a once-daily sidekiq job.

The Admin → Users → Active and Admin → Reports → Visits look reliable. I am certain only 4 “members” logged in to my localhost dev site during the past week (in an attempt to repro multiple Notifications).

 ![](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/3X/4/9/49c50fe4d98ffead20e96bc3bd779273adee2232.png)

But the Users page has issues that I’ve looked into more than once but as of yet haven’t been able to get any solid leads let alone pin down.

 ![](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/3X/f/d/fd1b6af0e10aeeec6a05d73127ce1352eedc4513.png)