# Include group membership in algorithm for summary email composition

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/include-group-membership-in-algorithm-for-summary-email-composition/69585
**Category:** Feature
**Created:** [September 7, 2017, 10:03pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/include-group-membership-in-algorithm-for-summary-email-composition/69585 "2017-09-07T22:03:52Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![tophee](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/tophee/32/73406_2.png) [@tophee](https://meta.discourse.org/u/tophee)
#### Post date: [September 7, 2017, 10:03pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/include-group-membership-in-algorithm-for-summary-email-composition/69585/1 "2017-09-07T22:03:52Z")

</div>

When discourse composes a summary email for a user, does it somehow consider which groups that user is a member of? If not, wouldn’t that be a nifty (optional) feature to improve the relevance of summary emails?

More specifically, the idea is that if user A is in the same group as users X, Y, and Z, A probably has something in common with X, Y, and Z. So if one or more among X, Y, and Z liked or responded to a topic, chances are that A will also find that topic interesting and it should therefore be included in the summary email for A. In other words, this would imply something like attaching a weight to likes based on group membership.
