# Integration into custom auth system where emails are not unique?

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/integration-into-custom-auth-system-where-emails-are-not-unique/306489
**Category:** SSO
**Tags:** email
**Created:** [May 2, 2024, 3:50pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/integration-into-custom-auth-system-where-emails-are-not-unique/306489 "2024-05-02T15:50:43Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 9

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![supermathie](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/supermathie/32/507518_2.png) [@supermathie](https://meta.discourse.org/u/supermathie)
#### Post date: [May 3, 2024, 4:42am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/integration-into-custom-auth-system-where-emails-are-not-unique/306489/9 "2024-05-03T04:42:39Z")

</div>

> [@jonbarrow](#):
>
> If email logins are still displayed as being available on the login prompt on Discourse,

Have you changed the text that says email is acceptable to use? All text strings can be overridden.

> [@jonbarrow](#):
>
> This DEFINITELY was not clear based on the post alone

This would be a good candidate for documentation if we haven’t done it already.

If you’re looking to easily test these scenarios with a test site you can use e.g. [bratwurst](https://meta.discourse.org/t/bratwurst-the-wurst-possible-production-discourseconnect-provider/72343)

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/integration-into-custom-auth-system-where-emails-are-not-unique/306489)._