# Invite tokens accepted and ROT13 transformed

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/invite-tokens-accepted-and-rot13-transformed/90316>\
**Category:** Support\
**Created:** [6월 20, 2018, 2:40오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/invite-tokens-accepted-and-rot13-transformed/90316 "2018-06-20T14:40:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![techAPJ](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/techapj/32/342990_2.png) [@techAPJ](https://meta.discourse.org/u/techAPJ)\
**Post date:** [6월 21, 2018, 4:33오전 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/invite-tokens-accepted-and-rot13-transformed/90316/7 "2018-06-21T04:33:07Z")

</div>

> [@sam](#):
>
> we should require one more click here, is that not the case?

Yes, that is not the case for invite tokens (requires plugin: [discourse-invite-tokens](https://github.com/discourse/discourse-invite-tokens)).

I agree we should require at least an additional click, if possible a full-blown accept invite page like we have for regular invites with the ability to choose username and optionally provide name and password.

> [@sam](#):
>
> Then the easy fix is just say not valid if the email address has no @ in it, plus it would not be redeemed anyway

Agreed.

Added above tasks on my list. 📝

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/invite-tokens-accepted-and-rot13-transformed/90316)._