# Invite tokens without email?

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/invite-tokens-without-email/82669>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Tags:** invites\
**Created:** [March 10, 2018, 11:54am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/invite-tokens-without-email/82669 "2018-03-10T11:54:46Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![tophee](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/tophee/32/73406_2.png) [@tophee](https://meta.discourse.org/u/tophee)\
**Post date:** [March 10, 2018, 2:57pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/invite-tokens-without-email/82669/3 "2018-03-10T14:57:19Z")

</div>

Hm, thanks for sharing this. But my sense is that it makes things more complicated rather than simpler. It’s much easier to explain: “… and when you’re logged in, you just need to go to groups, find group xyz and click \<whatever it says on the button\>” than making them change emails. And more fail-proof too.

But although that is easier, there are still enough people around for whom “go to groups, find group xyz” constitutes a significant challenge.

> [@pfaffman](#):
>
> This comes up with some frequency.

Couldn’t find any previous topic when I searched earlier… But I’ll convert this topic into a feature request and we’ll see.

> [@pfaffman](#):
>
> A single link that you could share

I didn’t even dare to think beyond the one-token-per-new-user principle, I was still assuming separate tokens for each invitee, but yes, a single token would to the trick for me too.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/invite-tokens-without-email/82669)._