# Is "Extensibility" meant for discussing prospective plugins?
**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-extensibility-meant-for-discussing-prospective-plugins/12673
**Category:** Site feedback
**Created:** [2월 12, 2014, 2:08오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-extensibility-meant-for-discussing-prospective-plugins/12673 "2014-02-12T14:08:36Z")
**Posts on this page:** 2
**Page:** 1
### Author:  [@erlend\_sh](https://meta.discourse.org/u/erlend_sh)
#### Post date: [2월 12, 2014, 2:08오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-extensibility-meant-for-discussing-prospective-plugins/12673/1 "2014-02-12T14:08:39Z")
Description of Feature category:
> Discussion about features or potential features of Discourse: how they work, why they work, etc.
Description of Extensibility category:
> Topics about extending the functionality of Discourse with plugins, themes, add-ons, or other mechanisms for extensibility.
### Scenario 1
I have this great new feature idea for Discourse, but I’m proposing it as something that should be made as a plugin because I have no desire to see it added to core, ever.
_Where should I post?_
### Scenario 2
I have posted to the Feature category about a suggested new core feature for Discourse but the general consensus of the thread is that this feature should exist as a plugin.
_Should the thread be moved?_
---
### Author:  [@codinghorror](https://meta.discourse.org/u/codinghorror)
#### Post date: [2월 14, 2014, 3:41오전 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-extensibility-meant-for-discussing-prospective-plugins/12673/2 "2014-02-14T03:41:16Z")
I think either place is fine. Extensibility is more of a dev topic to me, with specifics about implementation.