# Is het mogelijk om de naam van authenticatieproviders te wijzigen onder \`Associated Accounts\` instellingen?

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-it-possible-the-change-the-name-of-auth-providers-under-associated-accounts-settings/264571
**Category:** SSO
**Tags:** auth-plugins
**Created:** [10 mei 2023 om 18:22 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-it-possible-the-change-the-name-of-auth-providers-under-associated-accounts-settings/264571 "2023-05-10T18:22:54Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![kwakubonsam](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/fbc32d/32.png) [@kwakubonsam](https://meta.discourse.org/u/kwakubonsam)
#### Post date: [10 mei 2023 om 18:22 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-it-possible-the-change-the-name-of-auth-providers-under-associated-accounts-settings/264571/1 "2023-05-10T18:22:54Z")

</div>

Is [en.login.{provider\_name}.name] the only allowed naming convention? I assumed `name` in [Auth::ManagedAuthenticator](https://github.com/discourse/discourse/blob/main/lib/auth/authenticator.rb) to be the display name of an auth provider.

 ![Screenshot 2023-05-10 at 14.04.20](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/4X/1/5/e/15e3dce8336989ccb3109295a04ab4509c7e271d.png)

Also, associated accounts do not appear in a user profile after successfully associating a SSO provider with an account. Is that a normal behavior?