# È possibile hashare il database delle email?

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-it-possible-to-hash-the-email-database/99072>\
**Category:** Feature\
**Created:** [9 Ottobre 2018, 6:02am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-it-possible-to-hash-the-email-database/99072 "2018-10-09T06:02:53Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 24

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Remah](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/remah/32/70590_2.png) [@Remah](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Remah)\
**Post date:** [10 Ottobre 2018, 8:37am UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-it-possible-to-hash-the-email-database/99072/24 "2018-10-10T08:37:00Z")

</div>

> [@lqiz5bso7g](#):
>
> I think you’re both correct that it’s not that easy to be anonymous in the digital world.

It is easy to be anonymous but that is not what you are asking for: You want users to be firstly identifiable as belonging to a set of non-anonymous users. That is what makes it hard to guarantee anonymity when an audit trail already exists.

What you want is something like an arms length relationship between the two states of identification and anonymity. You were trying to provide both from the same system when the confirmation that someone belongs to the organisation must happen totally independently from Discourse.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-it-possible-to-hash-the-email-database/99072)._