I’m just getting started learning ruby, but I’ve been a DBA for over 30 years, the last 20 of them on PostgreSQL. The data structure is complex, but I’ve seen (and probably written) worse. Is it possible to do things like change what group a large number of users are in using SQL rather than rake?…

You are kind of playing with fire if you go down that path, you are likely to miss records in all sorts of auditing tables and clearly bypass lots of validations in code. It is technically possible buy highly risky.

See also Administrative Bulk Operations for ways to do bulk updates.

Yeah and I’m not going the SQL route. Sometimes when you are faced with a problem, a more creative approach to the problem is more elegant than your original design, and that’s how I’m structuring my archives. But I am impressed with the data structure Discourse is using, and my congratulations to…

Ist es möglich, Datenbankänderungen mit Postgres anstelle von Rake vorzunehmen?

Entwickler

pfaffman (Jay Pfaffman) 24. März 2023 um 14:21 3

Siehe auch Administrative Massenvorgänge für Möglichkeiten, Massenaktualisierungen durchzuführen.

Thema		Antworten	Aufrufe
How can I directly edit Discourse database from a GUI? Self-hosting	20	3696	14. Mai 2020
Writing directly to the database Development	17	486	24. März 2024
Is there a way to bulk-change user 'names' (note: not usernames) Support	10	695	18. Juli 2023
Rake db:migrate error Support	5	613	16. September 2022
Getting issue with Database Migrations Self-hosting	2	802	24. Oktober 2018

Ist es möglich, Datenbankänderungen mit Postgres anstelle von Rake vorzunehmen?

Verwandte Themen