# Is pitchfork using too much memory?

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-pitchfork-using-too-much-memory/410280
**Category:** Self-hosting
**Created:** [August 17, 2026, 9:33pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-pitchfork-using-too-much-memory/410280 "2026-08-17T21:33:30Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Falco](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/falco/32/179432_2.png) [@Falco](https://meta.discourse.org/u/Falco)
#### Post date: [August 17, 2026, 9:56pm UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-pitchfork-using-too-much-memory/410280/2 "2026-08-17T21:56:32Z")

</div>

> [@Ed\_S](#):
>
> ```plaintext
> pitchfork (gen:0) worker[3] - requests: 6684, waiting
> pitchfork (gen:0) worker[2] - requests: 14756, waiting
> pitchfork (gen:0) worker[1] - requests: 97007, waiting
> pitchfork (gen:0) worker[0] - requests: 2229848, waiting
> 
> ```

![cpu0](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/meta/original/4X/f/a/4/fa495079c85460e81556b7015cd5fda1539552bd.webp)

In a more serious note, the one doing all the work has just 100MB RSS over the average? Looks normal to me, or am I missing something ?

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-pitchfork-using-too-much-memory/410280)._