# A abordagem do plugin ninja multi-hostname de Sam ainda é válida?

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-sams-multi-hostname-ninja-plugin-approach-still-valid/193965>\
**Category:** Development\
**Created:** [15 Junho , 2021 22:42 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-sams-multi-hostname-ninja-plugin-approach-still-valid/193965 "2021-06-15T22:42:32Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![f1r4s](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/f1r4s/32/245347_2.png) [@f1r4s](https://meta.discourse.org/u/f1r4s)\
**Post date:** [16 Janeiro , 2022 00:33 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-sams-multi-hostname-ninja-plugin-approach-still-valid/193965/4 "2022-01-16T00:33:22Z")

</div>

Olá @downey @Falco,

Vocês podem compartilhar conosco o guia de uso do DISCOURSE\_BACKUP\_HOSTNAME com a configuração do tor?

Eu o fiz no ano passado; mas agora tenho alguns conflitos ao conectar o contêiner onion com a configuração do nginx. Estou recebendo uma página em branco para o endereço onion.

```plaintext
ERR_EMPTY_RESPONSE

```

Obrigado.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-sams-multi-hostname-ninja-plugin-approach-still-valid/193965)._