# Is there a way to quote something that was said on a different Discourse instance?

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-there-a-way-to-quote-something-that-was-said-on-a-different-discourse-instance/18815>\
**Category:** Site feedback\
**Created:** [8월 13, 2014, 3:48오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-there-a-way-to-quote-something-that-was-said-on-a-different-discourse-instance/18815 "2014-08-13T15:48:11Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 12

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![almereyda](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/almereyda/32/367792_2.png) [@almereyda](https://meta.discourse.org/u/almereyda)\
**Post date:** [9월 15, 2015, 9:55오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-there-a-way-to-quote-something-that-was-said-on-a-different-discourse-instance/18815/12 "2015-09-15T21:55:33Z")

</div>

With

> **[Vouch](https://indieweb.org/vouch)**
>
> The Vouch protocol is an anti-spam extension to Webmention that can also be used to customize how your site accepts responses from different audiences.

in place, can we imagine trusted, in this case vouched, Discourse federations and/or multisites with distributed conversations takeing place?

[http://twitter.com/brennannovak/status/481411357279911938](http://twitter.com/brennannovak/status/481411357279911938)

Btw., to the mods @codinghorror and @sam, I just wanted to revisit the

> [@almereyda](#):
>
> its name implies **sociological reasoning about the underlying principles** , regulated algorithmically by its codebase.

and don’t have access to said topic anymore. Do you know why?

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-there-a-way-to-quote-something-that-was-said-on-a-different-discourse-instance/18815)._
