# 이메일 답글에 POP3 대신 IMAP을 사용할 수 있는 방법이 있나요?

**URL:** https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-there-a-way-to-use-imap-instead-of-pop3-for-replies-by-email/279012
**Category:** Support
**Tags:** email
**Created:** [9월 9, 2023, 6:40오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-there-a-way-to-use-imap-instead-of-pop3-for-replies-by-email/279012 "2023-09-09T18:40:25Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![pfaffman](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/pfaffman/32/120154_2.png) [@pfaffman](https://meta.discourse.org/u/pfaffman)
#### Post date: [9월 14, 2023, 3:12오후 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-there-a-way-to-use-imap-instead-of-pop3-for-replies-by-email/279012/5 "2023-09-14T15:12:37Z")

</div>

> [@jeanas](#):
>
> POP을 지원하는 이메일 서비스로 리다이렉션을 설정해야 할 것 같습니다. 뭐, 어쩔 수 없죠.

가장 쉬운 방법은 [Configure direct-delivery incoming email for self-hosted sites with Mail-Receiver](https://meta.discourse.org/t/straightforward-direct-delivery-incoming-mail/49487) 입니다.

어쨌든 IMAP 서버를 유지보수하는 것보다 훨씬 쉽습니다.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-there-a-way-to-use-imap-instead-of-pop3-for-replies-by-email/279012)._