# Is there any reason why small images don't have thumbnails?

**URL:** <https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-there-any-reason-why-small-images-dont-have-thumbnails/61806>\
**Category:** UX\
**Created:** [2017 年4 月 28 日 23:22 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-there-any-reason-why-small-images-dont-have-thumbnails/61806 "2017-04-28T23:22:58Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

作者： ![scombs](https://sea3.discourse-cdn.com/meta/user_avatar/meta.discourse.org/scombs/32/48616_2.png) [@scombs](https://meta.discourse.org/u/scombs)\
发布日期： [2017 年4 月 29 日 00:59 UTC](https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-there-any-reason-why-small-images-dont-have-thumbnails/61806/3 "2017-04-29T00:59:33Z")

</div>

I would prefer all images be expandable. Often the small images are the ones that need to be expandable so you can see detail. There is also the consistency/predictability issue.

---

_[View the full topic](https://meta.discourse.org/t/is-there-any-reason-why-small-images-dont-have-thumbnails/61806)._